Student Athletes Should Not Receive Additional Money Essay -- Argument

Student Athletes Should Not Receive Additional M hotshoty When a scholarly person athlete signs a letter of intent to play at a division one school, he or she is gener wholey happy for the prospect to perform at the highest level of college competition. Like all good things though, they in the end come to an end. After awhile athletes soon begin to realize not all of their expenses are paid for. Because some of the extra costs in college are put on school-age child athletes, some suggest the NCAA and new(prenominal) sources should provide additional funding to help athletes out. This issue has created a alter debate over the relationship between capital and college athletes. On the contrary, the stronger subscriber line lies with those individuals that say student athletes should not receive additional gold, and how the NCAA is dealing with the mail service right now is fine. In other words, athletes competing at the division one level do not need to be paid any( prenominal) amount of money on top of obtaining a scholarship. If the current legality the NCAA has now is working, then it should not be fixed. Because this is such a considerable topic, there are still arguments for the opposition.In contrast to the NCAAs rules and regulations, those in favor of paying student athletes say money is a extremity to get through college. They say even though full lecture athletes receive a free education, certain accessories still require money from their own pocket. Some of these items include laundry, clothing, phone bills, transportation, entertainment, toiletries, and eating off campus. The money for these things usually comes from parents or, if they are lucky, a grant of some kind is inclined to the athlete. But in order to receive a grant, a student athlete must apply for financial ... ...regarding college athletes receiving money many things would be different in the future. A major concern involves recruiting. Universities allow ed to pay players would be able to buy recruits and this may persuade them to attend the school religious offering the most money. Its almost like a free doer in professional sports. Attending the school with the most to offer decreases the likeliness of a fair playing ground for all of college athletics. As a result certain schools would be major powerhouses and it would stay this way forever. cerebrate all the ideas and argument above illustrates just a small grammatical constituent of why the NCAA has yet to pass a law of this magnitude. The evidence for all those in supporting athletes receiving money are not strong plenty for action to take place. Overall if student athletes begin to get paid, collegial sports will become corrupted.