Ethics Case Study: Homeless Man Essay

Case FactsWe decided to discuss the case of the homeless public provided in the textbook. Here ar the case facts A homeless homosexual attempted to save a wo art object that was being attacked in parvenu York City. In the process he was stabbed. He was visibly bleeding on the side passing for over an hour, as people walked by, took pictures and stopped to look at him. One slice shook him. No one attempted to service of process him, stay with him, or call emergency services. The homeless realityhood died on the sidewalk.Obligations, Duties and RightsAfter reading the initial facts of the case, we discussed the obligations, duties and rights all held by the passersby and viewers of the situation. They are as follows Every passerby has the right to their personal safeguard and health, as well as the right to remain silent and anonymous. Given these infallible rights, every passerby also has the good duty and obligation to spread abroad a witnessed crime to the authorities. T hey also have the duty to work towards maintaining the safety and well-being of their community. Along with this duty, comes to obligation to support and protect the most undefended among this community.ConsequencesOur group further discussed the implications of the situation and the associated consequences, both intended and unintended, arbitrary and negative. pursual are the consequences that could have occurred if the passersby had chosen to offer advocate to the homeless man First, the mans life could have been saved. Another outcome would be the finding and persecution of the criminal.Another, would be setting a positive example for the community, in turn promoting the safety of the community as a whole. Another positive consequence could be acting as a catalyst for adjoining laws to be enacted aiding the community. Finally, a positive outcome from serviceing the homeless man would leave the passersby with altruistic emotions.Negative consequences that could result from refusing to aid the homeless man would include The homeless man dies and the criminal escapes, potentially continuing to hurt more members of the community. Another consequence includes the public losing a sense of credential as well as the passersby having the uneasiness and uncertainty of not sharp the outcome of the situation if they chose to walk away before his death. Finally, if the passerby chose to walk away, they face the negative consequence of feeling of regret upon denying their personal righteous philosophy and obligations.Moral IdealsHaving analyzed the facts, obligations and consequences of the case, the moral angels that we have extrapolated are Justice, integrity, loving kindness, and courage. Justice, denoting the military rating of situations according to their merits, fairly and without prejudice, as well as giving individually person his or her due. The best(p) way to carry out evaluator in this situation would have been to ensure that the criminal was f ound and prosecuted, and defend the life of the homeless man. Integrity, the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles regardless of who is watching, is the second moral principle that we have decided best relates to this case.If the passerby had acted with integrity, he/she would have opted to stay with or somehow help the homeless man to insure that his life was saved as debate to denying their moral obligation in walking away and choosing to ignore the situation. The next moral principle is Loving kindness, doing unto others as you would have them do unto you, or simply the Golden Rule. If the passersby had showed loving kindness, they would have felt empathy towards the homeless man as a fellow human being and would have ensured that he received aid, as they would have wished someone do for them if their roles were reversed.The final moral ideal that we felt most applied to this case was courage, consisting only in conquering fear and in withholding the body f rom flight no matter what the risk of pain. We felt that this moral ideal applied to the case, as it would require the passersby to ignore their rights to safety as humans and allow their obligations to aid the man override their sense of fear and insecurity. If the passerby had maintained this ideal of courage, they would have approached the homeless man and helped to save his life.