Conflicts During The 1920s :: essays research papers

Conflicts During the 1920sThe contrast between the new and changing attitudes and traditionalvalues was unmistakably present during the 1920s. This clash between the venerableand the new had many roots and was inevitable. A new sense of cognizance washedover minorities in our nation, especially blacks who began to realize that theywere entitled to their suffer subculture, pursuit of success, and share of theAmerican dream. This ideal was expressed by Langston Hughes in "The NegroArtist and the Racial Mountain." They were supported by the growing anatomy ofyoung, financially well-to-do liberals who formed the new intelligencia. Eachgroup sought-after(a) the use of logic and rational reasoning in their re mentation ofreevaluation of societys current status. Still, they accomplished a minorityand their reformist views were not well- guardn by the greater bit of thepopulation who had become accustomed to a certain way of seeing were notwilling to budge, thus keeping the radicals silent. Individualism was also partly suppresse d by the succession of three traditionalist Republicanpresidents whose philia to the strong was displayed by their strong backingof big business slice discouraging the Labor Union movement. Literature was onemedium by which the new intelligencia could express their views onimpracticality and injustice of the social system and administration in the 1920s.     Sinclair Lewis was one such author who used his writing to fate thestale and outdated ways of thinking that were so widely fashionable in our nationduring the 1920s. In addition to exposing the poor working conditions of nearlyfactory labor, particularly the meat-packing industry, he criticized the commonman who could not think or act individually in his novel, Babbit, which waspublished in 1922. His interpretation from the novel of the common man portrayed aperson who acted in a manner that was socially acceptable who also strived forsuccess gr ound on societys definition of purchasing material goods. In essencehe was a man defined by the society that he lived in.      righteousness was also a topic of controversy during the twenties.Traditionalists who were usually older and less(prenominal) intelligent than the risingyoung class of liberal intellectuals were primarily Christian and would onlyaccept literal interpretations of the Bible. The liberals were not so quick totake the Bible at face value and came up their own interpretations. The accentbetween the old and the new regarding religion was perhaps most evidentlyprevalent at the Tennessee Evolution Court Case of 1925.     In this cartridge clip of where individual thinking was a rarity, publicmisconception and ignorance ran abound. People looked to scapegoats to account